2007 - 2014 Expedition & Navigator 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator

Getting Michelin LTX M/S 2 - stick with 4 ply or go with 10 ply?

  #1  
Old 07-16-2010, 02:01 PM
wogdiml's Avatar
wogdiml
wogdiml is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting Michelin LTX M/S 2 - stick with 4 ply or go with 10 ply?

Would the E rated tire be too stiff on a 2007 Expedition 4x4? They are priced a few bucks cheaper and the tire store says they will wear better than the 4 ply. My concern is that they won't feel as smooth on the road - plus these have a 70,000 mile tread wear warranty either way.

What about the road hazard warranty (Big O and Discount Tire are big on selling this) - anybody support this? I have never bought it or used it, but each time I get a set of tires I contemplate whether I should for a little extra. It runs about $30 per tire. They say they'll replace a damaged tire for free if you have the warranty, but once you get some mileage on the tires they don't recommend replacing just 1 tire anyways. I usually decline this due to paying so much for tires anyways.
 
  #2  
Old 07-16-2010, 02:49 PM
tooldad's Avatar
tooldad
tooldad is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I generally do not think extended warranties of any type are worth it. That said, my wife purchased it on her tire set when she had to replace a single tire blowout. Tire was ~$160. The next day we discovered the other tire on the same side had received damage too, but they replaced it for "free". Of course we had to purchase the road hazard again for the replacement tire. In the end, it was about a wash, but this started the cycle.

I purchased it with a set of truck tires, OTD price ~$1050. About 20k into them I experienced a blowout (not because of tire integrity I will add). These tires were expensive, and the warranty paid, and again, it was about a wash. I think you would typically have to replace two tires under warranty to actually make it an advantage. I guess the point is that it is nice to have, but the likelihood of it ever paying off is nill I think.

Like all warranties and insurance, it's a gamble.
 

Last edited by tooldad; 07-16-2010 at 02:50 PM. Reason: spelling
  #3  
Old 07-16-2010, 04:41 PM
berry1234's Avatar
berry1234
berry1234 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I would never put 10ply tires on a vehicle that you were concerned about ride comfort. The stiff sidewalls make the ride so much worse. I had a set of 10ply on my 05 F150. It fell like the shocks/springs were welded together. Never again.
 
  #4  
Old 07-16-2010, 04:44 PM
wogdiml's Avatar
wogdiml
wogdiml is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Went with the 4 ply!

Glad to say I went with the 4 ply. The ride home felt better on the interstate than when we first bought the truck. The tires feel tight, but smooth. Compared to the OEM Continentals w/ 57,000 miles this feels like a new truck again. Thanks for the feedback.
 
  #5  
Old 07-16-2010, 05:16 PM
tooldad's Avatar
tooldad
tooldad is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Road hazard or not?
 
  #6  
Old 07-16-2010, 05:22 PM
wogdiml's Avatar
wogdiml
wogdiml is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tooldad
Road hazard or not?
I didn't pay the extra $130 for the free road hazard, just stuck with the prorated road hazard that is included. Thanks for your reply, it pretty much lined up with my thoughts in the past when I decline the optional road hazard coverage.
 
  #7  
Old 07-16-2010, 06:04 PM
berry1234's Avatar
berry1234
berry1234 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I had 3 nails and needed 2 new tires before I got road hazard. After getting it? Nothing. My luck. It's a gamble either way with odds leaning towards not getting it as cheaper.
 
  #8  
Old 10-05-2010, 02:17 PM
nederanger's Avatar
nederanger
nederanger is offline
New User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
an educated gamble

Road hazard, electronic service plans, life insurance, gambling, its all the same. A company or casino will take on risk for a price, and they stay in business if they charge a little more than their customers are paid out. The market is very efficient in these businesses -- that's how an economist describes a market that has no hidden tricks or insider information (the worthwhile side of economics, the worthless side is when they advise presidents to bail out failing markets, like speculative banks).

So road hazard is only financially worthwhile if your specific tire and driving history is for above average tire damage.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
z31freakify
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
15
04-25-2017 07:15 PM
meborder
Conventional (Bumper Pull) Towing; Travel Trailers & Pop-ups
33
09-20-2016 02:02 PM
farmallmta
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
03-29-2015 04:16 PM
jgavac
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
26
03-13-2014 01:05 PM
mechelement
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
23
09-01-2009 11:33 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Getting Michelin LTX M/S 2 - stick with 4 ply or go with 10 ply?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.