1st batch fails 27/3 test.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-06-2009, 06:09 PM
Rushmore X's Avatar
Rushmore X
Rushmore X is offline
Logistics Pro

Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 3,678
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
1st batch fails 27/3 test.

After having it sit in the reactor for over a week, I fiinally got around to testing it. It did get below freezing for a few days, and is now in the 50's, if that makes a difference. In the sight tube it looked good, I could actually read through it. However there was about a half inch of clear fluid on the top. According to a previous post, Fabman said this was probably soap. I shook it in the tube, and it did become like soapy water, so I'm assuming that it is soap. The 27/3 test was done, and as the pic's show, it became cloudy after shaking for 5 sec. After sitting in the flask for about 10 minutes, there is a blob of oil on the bottom, and the solution is less cloudy, so some of the 3 ml has fallen out of solution. Hope these pics attach.
Anyhow, how did I manage to get underreaction and soap at the same time?
 
Attached Images   
  #2  
Old 02-06-2009, 06:37 PM
Rushmore X's Avatar
Rushmore X
Rushmore X is offline
Logistics Pro

Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 3,678
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
This is wierd, the "blob" just fell apart and went back into solution? On another forum, it was suggested that I might have a "false fail" due to not having heat the oil up to room temp. Anyway the solution is probably is getting close to room temp now.
 
Attached Images   
  #3  
Old 02-06-2009, 08:30 PM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
It is possible to make soap, and still have an incomplete reaction. Did you do a "sizzle" test on your oil? Water is the most likely suspect. Just because you can't see any water in the oil doesn't mean there's NO water present. It only takes .05% H2O to cause problems.

What tends to happen with excess water present is the water "pulls" some of the lye out of the methoxide solution to form soap, leaving less catalyst for the reaction.

You should be able to save this batch by reprocessing using a couple of gallons of Methanol and 3-5 grams/liter of lye.

Are you using KOH, or NaOH, and have you removed the glycerol already?
 
  #4  
Old 02-06-2009, 09:42 PM
Rushmore X's Avatar
Rushmore X
Rushmore X is offline
Logistics Pro

Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 3,678
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
We used KOH, and the Glycerine has been saved in another container. We used the 80/20 method, if that makes a difference. Was thinking of re-heating the bio while running the reactor to drive off any water.
It's been a couple hours now, and after reshaking the mixture in the flask the oil seems to be remaining in suspension.
 
  #5  
Old 02-07-2009, 09:51 AM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
It sure looks too cloudy ( read "unreacted") to me..............

It should look like this:

 
  #6  
Old 02-07-2009, 10:46 AM
Rushmore X's Avatar
Rushmore X
Rushmore X is offline
Logistics Pro

Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 3,678
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Think I'll try the test again. "When in doubt, read the instructions". After sitting overnight, I shook it up again, and this time it stayed in suspension. The 27/3 solution isn't exactly clear, but if I set the flask over a piece of paper, I can read through it. Still will have to deal with the soap issue...
 
  #7  
Old 02-07-2009, 11:06 AM
Rushmore X's Avatar
Rushmore X
Rushmore X is offline
Logistics Pro

Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 3,678
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Also will take a sample and do the sizzle test as you recommended, we thought that we had all of the water out of it. We have a settling tank setup before the reactor with the outlet about 15 gallons up from the bottom, so the good oil goes into the reactor and the water and junk goes to the bottom. We ran the reactor about three hours @ 145 (hottest we could get it) until there wasn't much distillate coming out of the condenser...
Will add more insulation to see if I can get up to 155, but that's as high as the thermostat goes.
Will have to post some pics sometime.
 
  #8  
Old 02-07-2009, 11:12 AM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I don't use a waterheater thermostat in my system. I found that the waterheater thermostats use a "snap" switch, and can drop as much as 20 deg before comming back on. I use a oven thermostat which only drops about 2-3 deg before comming back on. Much better temp control, and I can turn it up over 210 deg to boil all the water out first.
 
  #9  
Old 02-07-2009, 11:16 AM
Rushmore X's Avatar
Rushmore X
Rushmore X is offline
Logistics Pro

Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 3,678
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Hmm, I like that idea. With a partial vacuum and 3500 ft elevation, that should easily be hot enough to boil off water. Will pass that on to my partner... thanks again!
 
  #10  
Old 02-07-2009, 11:17 AM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Trent Fliginger
We ran the reactor about three hours @ 145 (hottest we could get it) until there wasn't much distillate coming out of the condenser...
If you where getting distillate from your condenser, you most certantly had water in the system.

145-155 deg is not enough to remove the suspended water...........
 
  #11  
Old 02-07-2009, 11:20 AM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Trent Fliginger
Hmm, I like that idea. With a partial vacuum and 3500 ft elevation, that should easily be hot enough to biol off water. Will pass that on to my partner... thanks again!
At your elevation, 20" of vacuum would pull all of the water out
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dank Hill
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
04-25-2016 02:32 PM
rcb1031
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator
19
03-19-2015 03:56 PM
Ralph
2009 - 2014 F150
8
04-30-2012 06:29 PM
Rushmore X
Bio-diesel, Propane & Alternative Diesel Engine Fuels
21
03-09-2009 09:10 AM
wilhu50
Cooling, Heating, Ventilation & A/C
4
02-01-2004 11:50 PM



Quick Reply: 1st batch fails 27/3 test.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.