Nova Scotia Join Chapter, Leader:

306 build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:09 PM
northeaster79's Avatar
northeaster79
northeaster79 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: trenton ns canada
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
306 build

I'll start a new thread here and see if we can't revive a little interest of some kind in the atlantic chapter.I'm starting my 306 sbf build for my 78 F100.bought a 5.0 engine from an 89 mustang.took the fuelie gear of it and got rid of it and sent the heads to a local machine shop for 3 angle valve job and a good going over.thinking on the E303 cam and a weiand stealth or excellerator intake and a holley 670 street avenger carb.already running dynomax long tubes and 40 series on it.this should wake up the old girl a little.will be a good start to my quicker then 16 second 1/4 mile time.
 

Last edited by northeaster79; 12-04-2008 at 01:34 PM. Reason: moved part of thread to want ads
  #2  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:39 PM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,667
Received 1,351 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Hi, it`s nice to see a post on here finally after a long spell.
Sounds like a neat motor build, it should wake your truck up nicely.
The 3.55`s without an overdrive transmission will kill off some of your fuel mileage off though it`s not bad if it`s not your daily driver.
 
  #3  
Old 12-04-2008, 02:14 PM
northeaster79's Avatar
northeaster79
northeaster79 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: trenton ns canada
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no its not going to be a daily driver,just a toy and maybe a little back and forth to work.all in town driven on those days,not looking for fuel millage looking to melt some tires and take to the track and have a little fun.should turn on pretty well,the truck is light.weighed in at 3720 lbs.I found a set glass fenders and some other things to help lighten the load.
 
  #4  
Old 12-04-2008, 03:07 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro
preppypyro is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Central Rural Sask.
Posts: 37,859
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
I dont know why i am always so damned interested in the economy factor of rides, but I am!

However since its your toy, go for broke man! Find some 4:10 gears, slap in a c6 or even a well built c4 (if your going for an auto) and you will easily have a tire melter!

Sounds like a neat project though, although now that ya mentioned it, we are gonna need pics!!
 
  #5  
Old 12-05-2008, 06:44 AM
northeaster79's Avatar
northeaster79
northeaster79 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: trenton ns canada
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well thats really all I'm going for right now is a tire fryer.but its a C4 now I'm going with a 2500 stall and a shift kit,if I could get some 4:10's that what will go in it.
 
  #6  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:15 AM
loudfords's Avatar
loudfords
loudfords is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Beachville, Ontario
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds like a sweet driving truck, northeaster. My 79 ran 16.2 in the 1/4 with a 351W, but that was also with 2.75 gears. 3 somethings would make it a fair bit quicker.
 
  #7  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:36 AM
northeaster79's Avatar
northeaster79
northeaster79 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: trenton ns canada
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well it should be quick enough to get into the 14's I would think.I had an 89 5.0 convertable with a cage in it that was 3669 lbs with a fairly stock engine,T5 and 4:11 and the best I could get out of that was 13.98 until I did some more work.
 
  #8  
Old 12-05-2008, 02:54 PM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,667
Received 1,351 Likes on 1,110 Posts
3669 seem`s heavy to me as I always thought these cars were in the 3,200-3,300 lb range. It seems I learn something new every day.
Last fall one of our chapter members John/xplict took in his 1989 Mustang LX convertible/393 Windsor for a dyno test: DynoRun2.flv - Video - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
DynoRun.flv - Video - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Here's the link to some of the Man/Sask chapter Mustangs thread starting with John`s 89: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...-of-yours.html
 
  #9  
Old 12-05-2008, 03:03 PM
northeaster79's Avatar
northeaster79
northeaster79 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: trenton ns canada
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe your right on the money for the weight for the coupes,and I think the hatches were right around the same weight.mine had an overbuilt 6 point cage,and subframe connectors,and the verts have the stiffning rails on the inner rockers and the power top pump and motor are a soggy combination too.but it did launch nice with all the extra weight in the rear of the car,battery was back there too.without slicks I was going by the tree in third gear spinning the tires and with slicks just grabbing for second.I kinda miss that car,until I remember what it was like with the top up and in the rain.
 
  #10  
Old 12-05-2008, 03:38 PM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,667
Received 1,351 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Sounds like quite the ride down the drag strip.
No problems with my 83 5.0 convertible in rain except for hydro planing.......
 
  #11  
Old 12-05-2008, 07:50 PM
Glenn Graham's Avatar
Glenn Graham
Glenn Graham is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds great noreaster but it's still a truck. why not sell the 2wd and get another mustang,there much more fun.get the 4wd on the road to have a truck when you need it.my best time with my 89 5.0 was 14.10 at Maitland years ago.it was stock except for headers.
 
  #12  
Old 12-05-2008, 09:01 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro
preppypyro is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Central Rural Sask.
Posts: 37,859
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
I had a 87 mustang back when i was in the last year of high school, and I miss that car something fierce too. Im gonna get another one yet, i have a few ford trucks kicking around, time for a fun car
 
  #13  
Old 12-06-2008, 11:00 PM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,667
Received 1,351 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Originally Posted by Glenn Graham
Sounds great noreaster but it's still a truck. Why not sell the 2wd and get another Mustang, they`re much more fun.
Good point, have twice the fun factor.
 
  #14  
Old 12-08-2008, 07:49 AM
northeaster79's Avatar
northeaster79
northeaster79 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: trenton ns canada
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will someday have another 5.0.I want to buy a nice rust free 4cylender and buy a smashed or rotten 5.0,but for now I want to see how fast I can get that truck moving with a base engine from a mustang.alot harder to get a truck fast then car,looking for a challenge hahaha.but yes the 5.0 mustangs are a hell of a fun car,I had an 82 gt,81 rs capri and 86 gt and the 89 convertable,all met the same demise except the convertable.rocks and trees are hard on cars.
 
  #15  
Old 12-08-2008, 07:55 AM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,667
Received 1,351 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Hi Fred, no doubt rocks and trees are hard on cars, just thinking about that and a 5.0 gives me the creeps........
 


Quick Reply: 306 build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.