Harmonic Balancer questions

  #1  
Old 07-24-2002, 01:25 AM
chickenass's Avatar
chickenass
chickenass is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harmonic Balancer questions

I need to replace my harmonic balancer on an '83 Ford Bronco with a 351w and duraspark3 ignition system.

The old one is part # e1te c3a. e=80's 1=1 t=truck e=engine part

The one I pulled off an '82 ltd is part # e2te d3a.

The weight on the two seem different. I've read that they should all be the same weight. Does anyone know what the c3a and d3a stand for or anyother way to find out if these match.
 
  #2  
Old 07-24-2002, 09:06 AM
71swissaqua's Avatar
71swissaqua
71swissaqua is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Huntersville
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harmonic Balancer questions

Are you sure the 82 LTD was a 351W and not a 302? I don't remember when thay changed the weights and which way they went on the 302's. I'll bet Torque King does though, might want to get up with him.
Clint
 
  #3  
Old 07-24-2002, 10:32 AM
Brian's Avatar
Brian
Brian is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harmonic Balancer questions

The weight of the balancers may be different but it is the imbalance weight that is important. The 351W uses a 28 oz as did the 302 through 76 I believe. The trucks sometimes had a wider balancer which made it heavier but also had more surface area on the rubber to provide better damping. For a fast reving motor you would want to the lighter/thinner balancer so the angular inertia would be less. For a torque motor the thicker balancer is better becuase it has more inertia.
 
  #4  
Old 07-24-2002, 01:18 PM
chickenass's Avatar
chickenass
chickenass is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harmonic Balancer questions

Thanks for all the help. I actually only needed to replace the plate on the rear of the damper. After playing with it for a while I fund this was a seperate piece. It runs much better know that it's firing on all 8 cylinders instead of only six. Thanks again for the help.
James
 
  #5  
Old 07-24-2002, 02:48 PM
TorqueKing's Avatar
TorqueKing
TorqueKing is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harmonic Balancer questions

For the record, the 52 oz imbablance started in 1981, on 302's only. I like that comment about angular inertia, now we're talkin'! TK
 
  #6  
Old 07-24-2002, 06:17 PM
TorqueKing's Avatar
TorqueKing
TorqueKing is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harmonic Balancer questions

 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
retired ironworker
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
02-27-2015 08:12 PM
mikepedersen17
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
03-26-2012 08:46 PM
thrifty
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
12-23-2011 02:50 PM
Dan76'F100
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
06-17-2003 11:54 AM
cyberdiamond
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
8
10-23-2001 10:17 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Harmonic Balancer questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.