1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

01 4.0 SOHV upper intake manifold removal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-24-2007, 11:19 AM
tkle90's Avatar
tkle90
tkle90 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
01 4.0 SOHV upper intake manifold removal

It doesn't look anything like the illistration in my Haynes book.Where are the bolts located and how many?
 
  #2  
Old 02-24-2007, 07:33 PM
rubydist's Avatar
rubydist
rubydist is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4 on each side, 2 on the front port and 2 on the rear port. They are either allen head or torqx head.
 
  #3  
Old 02-25-2007, 08:44 AM
tkle90's Avatar
tkle90
tkle90 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

They're torqx.I saw them and thought maybe they were for the lower intake.Thanks for clearing that up.I.m getting a PO300 random misfire code along with PO174B and a PO171 system lean on banks 1&2.Do I need to replace the seals on both upper and lower intakes or just the upper?
This is my 1st thread on here.I've found most of the other information I've needed searching the archives.Some good stuff thanks to people like you.Thanks again!
 
  #4  
Old 02-25-2007, 09:27 AM
Bob Ayers's Avatar
Bob Ayers
Bob Ayers is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
First, welcome to FTE!!!

Before removing your upper and/or lower intake, there is a simple test you can do to find a vacuum leak. While the engine is at an idle, spray the upper to lower intake interface with carb cleaner (or other combustable) and look for a RPM change (either increase, or decrease). Repeat this procedure with the lower intake to heads interface.....

Good luck!!
 
  #5  
Old 02-25-2007, 09:49 AM
tkle90's Avatar
tkle90
tkle90 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Ayers
First, welcome to FTE!!!

Before removing your upper and/or lower intake, there is a simple test you can do to find a vacuum leak. While the engine is at an idle, spray the upper to lower intake interface with carb cleaner (or other combustable) and look for a RPM change (either increase, or decrease). Repeat this procedure with the lower intake to heads interface.....

Good luck!!
Fast answers.Love it!I'll try the carb cleaner.I've read of using propane,but that made me a bit nervous.Thanks.
 
  #6  
Old 02-25-2007, 09:52 AM
Bob Ayers's Avatar
Bob Ayers
Bob Ayers is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by tkle90
Fast answers.Love it!I'll try the carb cleaner.I've read of using propane,but that made me a bit nervous.Thanks.
Be careful with the carb cleaner also!!!!
 
  #7  
Old 02-25-2007, 12:19 PM
tkle90's Avatar
tkle90
tkle90 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was no noticeable change in RPM's.Where else should I check?
 
  #8  
Old 02-25-2007, 12:25 PM
Bob Ayers's Avatar
Bob Ayers
Bob Ayers is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
That's good news, I think you verified that you don't have a vacuum leak at the manifolds, or heads!!

The next thing that will throw lean codes (on both banks) is a dirty MAF sensor. Are you running a K&N air filter by any chance? They are known to contaminate MAF sensors, and IAC valves with the dirt and oil that they pass.
Try cleaning your MAF sensor (be very careful), and reset your PCM by disconnecting the negative battery cable, and touch it to the positive cable.

Good luck!!
 
  #9  
Old 02-25-2007, 02:07 PM
tkle90's Avatar
tkle90
tkle90 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks again and again.No K&N.Cleaned the sensor as best I could.It didn't appear too dirty but I live and work in very dusty conditions.I'll have to get the codes scanned again.Watching the grandkid while I'm trying to do this so I apologize for the spotty replies.Is there anything else I might check in the meantime?
 
  #10  
Old 02-25-2007, 02:40 PM
Bob Ayers's Avatar
Bob Ayers
Bob Ayers is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by tkle90
Thanks again and again.No K&N.Cleaned the sensor as best I could.It didn't appear too dirty but I live and work in very dusty conditions.I'll have to get the codes scanned again.Watching the grandkid while I'm trying to do this so I apologize for the spotty replies.Is there anything else I might check in the meantime?
Nothing until we hear the results of cleaning the MAF, and resetting the PCM.
Did you have a CEL (Check Engine Light) with the codes?
 
  #11  
Old 02-25-2007, 03:15 PM
tkle90's Avatar
tkle90
tkle90 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Yes there was a light.I don't have a scanner and won't be able to check until later in the week(Can't get out,got the grandkid still).I'll again post as soon as I get a scanner.
 
  #12  
Old 02-25-2007, 07:35 PM
rubydist's Avatar
rubydist
rubydist is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check all the rubber vacuum lines - they are known to get hard and crack, which allows in unmetered air and results in lean issues.
 
  #13  
Old 03-04-2007, 09:39 AM
tkle90's Avatar
tkle90
tkle90 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Haven't reread the codes yet, but after cleaning the MAF ,clearing the computer, and roughly 10 starts and over 600 miles the CEL hasn't stayed on at any time.I take it this is a good sign?If so I bow down to you guys,if not I still appreciate everything and will let you know when rechecked.
 
  #14  
Old 03-06-2007, 10:19 AM
MazdaRangerGuy's Avatar
MazdaRangerGuy
MazdaRangerGuy is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's the intake.. I've run into many of these that I was only able to verify by replacing the gaskets.

They tend to leak when the engine is cold, you might try the same check on a cold engine on a cold morning.

If your engine is SOHC (Single OverHead CAM) then replace both upper and lowers. There are no coolant passages in this design and once you have the upper off, the lower is a piece of cake.

If your engine is OHV/EFI (Traditional Push-rod style) then you only usually need to replace the upper.

Good luck.
 
  #15  
Old 03-06-2007, 04:10 PM
rubydist's Avatar
rubydist
rubydist is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just took off my upper intake manifold this weekend (to put on the supercharger!) and I discovered that it was just starting to leak at the #1 cylinder. The upper intakes have O-rings to seal them, so I'm guessing that just re-torquing the bolts would have solved the problem. I'd definitely try that before I took the whole thing apart...
 


Quick Reply: 01 4.0 SOHV upper intake manifold removal



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.