Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

2007 Toyota Tundra CrewMax Unveiled

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-07-2007, 03:41 PM
Red Star's Avatar
Red Star
Red Star is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 Toyota Tundra CrewMax Unveiled

http://news.windingroad.com/body-sty...wmax-unveiled/
 
  #2  
Old 01-07-2007, 06:15 PM
thorseshoeing's Avatar
thorseshoeing
thorseshoeing is offline
decadent and depraved

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Right Behind You
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Sweet truck...I like it. I just wish they would start making a 3/4 and ton truck...with a diesel engine.

Tim
 
  #3  
Old 01-07-2007, 06:29 PM
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
OSin86 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Racine county, WI
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The front will grow on me like everything else but the rest of it looks pretty sweet. If I was in the market I'd put it on my test drive list.
 
  #4  
Old 01-07-2007, 06:44 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane
Octane is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Edgerton, WI
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice truck. The only problem is that farmers and ranchers are never going to buy a Toyota.
 
  #5  
Old 01-07-2007, 06:49 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Exclamation

The 5.7 381 HP* Engine is only available in the SR5 amd Limited Double Cabs.

No prices have been announced, I checked edmunds, cars.com and toyota.com.

*Edmunds just dyno'd a 5.7 ..the results: 321HP at the rear wheels.


No fellow FTE'ers, I'm not buying one. Just checking up on the competition.
 
  #6  
Old 01-07-2007, 07:04 PM
thorseshoeing's Avatar
thorseshoeing
thorseshoeing is offline
decadent and depraved

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Right Behind You
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Octane
The only problem is that farmers and ranchers are never going to buy a Toyota.
You might be suprised...If they would come out with a 3/4 and ton truck with a diesel option, I know plenty that would...myself included.

Tim
 
  #7  
Old 01-07-2007, 07:26 PM
gdawghereiam's Avatar
gdawghereiam
gdawghereiam is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in a 82/350/400/at/2wd
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wonder how that 1/2 ton rig would pull 10,800 on hills.
 
  #8  
Old 01-07-2007, 08:09 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Thumbs down

I'd be hesitant to tow that much weight with a 1/2 ton truck regardless of the HP & Torque specs.

There's a rolling chassis of the new Tundra's making the rounds of the autoshows. No one will ever confuse the Toyota frame with an F150's frame.

The Tundra's frame looks flimsy, is unboxed, and the crossmembers aren't much better.
 
  #9  
Old 01-07-2007, 10:21 PM
Red Star's Avatar
Red Star
Red Star is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
  #10  
Old 01-07-2007, 11:01 PM
Jerme's Avatar
Jerme
Jerme is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
The 5.7 381 HP* Engine is only available in the SR5 amd Limited Double Cabs.

No prices have been announced, I checked edmunds, cars.com and toyota.com.

*Edmunds just dyno'd a 5.7 ..the results: 321HP at the rear wheels.


No fellow FTE'ers, I'm not buying one. Just checking up on the competition.
Are you being sarcastic? A 381 HP engine only available in a couple (and probly most popular) models is a bad thing? Are you aware the 5.7 has more HP at the rear wheels than the 5.4 at the crank??? I refuse to take part in this Ford: always good -- Toyota: always bad, crap. Time for Ford to step it up and get going on the Hurricane and/or Diesel option.
 
  #11  
Old 01-07-2007, 11:24 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by Jerme
Are you being sarcastic? A 381 HP engine only available in a couple (and probly most popular) models is a bad thing? Are you aware the 5.7 has more HP at the rear wheels than the 5.4 at the crank??? I refuse to take part in this Ford: always good -- Toyota: always bad, crap. Time for Ford to step it up and get going on the Hurricane and/or Diesel option.
There is nothing in my post saying one is better than the other, all I did is respond to this thread. Besides the Tundra won't be available until around the 7th of February, so outside of seeing a couple at the autoshows, I will not pass judgement on one till I drive it.

I'm not being sarcastic, I just posted the info that I read earlier today at edmunds, cars.com and Toyota.com

Only two CC models are available with the 5.7...go to Toyota's website and read it for yourself. This surprised me, seeing that you can buy several other trucks in stripper form with big engines from Nissan and GM.

I could care less how much HP one truck has at the crank, as opposed to what another truck has at the rear wheels. HP is what the car salesman sells...torque is what motivates the truck.

Personally I don't buy stuff based on HP...I buy stuff that fits me. I own 7 other vehicles besides Fords. Come on over, and see for yourself.
 
  #12  
Old 01-08-2007, 12:17 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane
Octane is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Edgerton, WI
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by thorseshoeing
You might be suprised...If they would come out with a 3/4 and ton truck with a diesel option, I know plenty that would...myself included.

Tim
Yeah and I know a lot of people who wouldnt be caught dead driving a Toyota, myself included.
Ive owned Toyotas in the past and they were good vehicles, but to be honest, Toyota's quality has really dropped in recent years. They arent anywhere near as unbreakable as they used to be.
You might say that Toyota has grown too big for its britches.
 
  #13  
Old 01-08-2007, 12:44 AM
Red Star's Avatar
Red Star
Red Star is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Toyotas weren't so boring to drive, maybe I would buy one. I like new Tundra and Camry, but if new Camry is anything like older Camry - I don't wanna it.
 
  #14  
Old 01-08-2007, 12:46 AM
seftonm's Avatar
seftonm
seftonm is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The way I understand the Toyota website, the 5.7 is optional for every trim level and configuration. Am I missing something?
 
  #15  
Old 01-08-2007, 12:48 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Unhappy

Originally Posted by seftonm
The way I understand the Toyota website, the 5.7 is optional for every trim level and configuration. Am I missing something?
No, but I am!! You're right....

No excuse...I should have gone to the Toyota site before I looked at edmund and cars.com

I went to the others first looking for a price.

Sorry...
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; 01-08-2007 at 12:53 AM.


Quick Reply: 2007 Toyota Tundra CrewMax Unveiled



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.