Comp Xtreme 4x4 cam, anyone?
#1
Comp Xtreme 4x4 cam, anyone?
Getting my 400 ready to go, and can't use the old Crower that was in the 351M I took out. Had flat spots on a few lobes. I know that the DEH cams are the standard, but I was wondering if anyone had tried this cam. The engine I will end up with has +.030 bore, stock piston, stock head machined for roller rockers, edelbrock intake, holley 4bbl, headers and dual ex. I will also be adding a new double roller timing set, and the correct springs. I bought a complete long block, so I can get by without the K-kit. I was wondering if anyone had ran one of these 4x4 cams recently, or if someone could help me understand if it would be any better or worse than one of the DEH cams. Here's the numbers I got for it, and the 255DEH and 265DEH to compare:
Duration @ .050 lift Lift w/1.5 ratio Lobe
RPM IN EX | IN EX | IN EX | sep
X4x4
1000- 256 262 | 210 218 | .514 .514 | 111
5000
255DEH
1200-
5500 255 265 | 203 216 | .469 .495 | 110
265DEH
1500-
5750 265 275 | 211 223 | .484 .514 | 110
What would be the pros/cons of the xtreme vs the DEH in my setup?
Thanks in advance
brent
Duration @ .050 lift Lift w/1.5 ratio Lobe
RPM IN EX | IN EX | IN EX | sep
X4x4
1000- 256 262 | 210 218 | .514 .514 | 111
5000
255DEH
1200-
5500 255 265 | 203 216 | .469 .495 | 110
265DEH
1500-
5750 265 275 | 211 223 | .484 .514 | 110
What would be the pros/cons of the xtreme vs the DEH in my setup?
Thanks in advance
brent
Last edited by bowser; 06-13-2006 at 07:58 PM. Reason: trying to get the chart to look better.....
#2
I like the 265DEH for towing at highway speeds, but for low RPM grunt, the 255DEH is better. This is the first I have seen the XE 4x4 cam. It has a little more lift than the 255DEH, but the stock heads don't flow much more above 0.450" lift.
Dyno sim gives the XE an advantage at 2000 RPM with 438 ft-lb torque, while the 255DEH gets 430 ft-lbs@2000. The 255DEH is a little flatter, and produces 298 HP@4000 RPM, while the XE has 297 HP@4000 RPM.
I think that the 4x4 XE is a slightly better cam, and could be much better with some head porting so the heads flow better at higher lifts.
Dyno sim gives the XE an advantage at 2000 RPM with 438 ft-lb torque, while the 255DEH gets 430 ft-lbs@2000. The 255DEH is a little flatter, and produces 298 HP@4000 RPM, while the XE has 297 HP@4000 RPM.
I think that the 4x4 XE is a slightly better cam, and could be much better with some head porting so the heads flow better at higher lifts.
#3
#4
#5
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Originally Posted by BroncoChuck
Maybe I am not looking in the right catalogs, but I thought they didn't make this cam for a 400? Is this a new offering or am I retarded?
Munch, thanks for the report.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alchemist1
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
18
08-02-2014 11:35 PM
dbossman
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
1
04-05-2006 07:39 PM
351M
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
9
08-03-2005 12:37 PM