Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150 SVT Ford F150 Lightning, Roush, Saleen and other performance F150's

just got a new 2002 lighting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-07-2006, 11:05 AM
ckirwan514's Avatar
ckirwan514
ckirwan514 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: georgia
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just got a new 2002 lighting

what kind of upgrades should or should not be done. truck already has the pullys changed with a preadter chip. i am interested in exhaust intake mostley.
 
  #2  
Old 03-07-2006, 12:07 PM
sigma's Avatar
sigma
sigma is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a Bassani exhaust on my 04 and love the sound. Magnaflow also makes great sounding exhaust. Others may disagree, but in my opinion if you are only running a pulley and Predator tune the stock intake is fine. Adding an aftermarket intake will increase the blower whine and sound great but you will not see any performance enhancement. If you decide to go ahead and change out the intake, stay away from the open filter style. Drawing hot air from under the hood can actually cost you horsepower at the rate of 1% loss for every ten-degree rise in intake temperature.
 
  #3  
Old 03-16-2006, 02:18 PM
hermn8r's Avatar
hermn8r
hermn8r is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
best to go over to the national lightning owners site for that info.
 
  #4  
Old 04-04-2006, 10:42 AM
96ninjaman's Avatar
96ninjaman
96ninjaman is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read a magazine article where an 02 HD actually lost a couple of hp with the intake until further mods were made. They dynoed the truck after each mod. Once they got rwhp up around 380 the intake made a fairly significant difference. The explanation was that the stock box was adequate up to 400 flywheel hp and the heat accounted for the lost they experienced. I would just get a K&N filter.
 
  #5  
Old 04-06-2006, 06:05 AM
captchas's Avatar
captchas
captchas is offline
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: north west new jersey
Posts: 7,988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.johnnylightningperf.com/
heres the link to the fastest lightning out there and true facts on spending wise cash on a lightning. john runs 9.52 sec. at 142 mph in a lightning
 

Last edited by captchas; 04-06-2006 at 06:30 AM.
  #6  
Old 04-29-2006, 11:52 PM
bigsnag's Avatar
bigsnag
bigsnag is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pryor
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Don't change the tranny settings with the chip/tuner. Get a FTVB for better shifting. Once you have that in, then you can do away with the torque reduction, with only minimal risk to the tranny. To do away with the torque reduction on a stock tranny is certain death.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blazer350
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
07-11-2013 03:00 PM
Tim Young
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
47
06-11-2011 12:23 PM
drewdole
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
5
02-07-2010 03:55 PM
pukemon
2004 - 2008 F150
14
03-22-2007 05:42 PM
Kenny
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
09-02-2001 10:39 PM



Quick Reply: just got a new 2002 lighting



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.