Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

why diesels suck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-01-2013, 09:46 PM
92blue on uhhhh blue's Avatar
92blue on uhhhh blue
92blue on uhhhh blue is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why diesels suck

anyone ever notice that diesels take a ton of boost from a turbo to make power not hating but i mean yeah ur diesel makes 800 ft pounds with at least 20 pounds of boost. put 20 pounds of boost on a gasser and it will make way more power. considering there are motors making way more power with less boost
 
  #2  
Old 02-01-2013, 09:50 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
easy tiger.
you can force induct a gas job,but it's not going to be so easy on fuel as a diesel.
diesels are working engines.sure some guys now buy them just for fun (it surprises the hell out of me how many still,even in the new economy but its very good to see so many still so fortunate) but many of us are out there putting their low end grunt advantage to use getting decent fuel economy while hauling/towing loads that would make a gas engine scream and cost you at the pump.
 
  #3  
Old 02-01-2013, 09:57 PM
92blue on uhhhh blue's Avatar
92blue on uhhhh blue
92blue on uhhhh blue is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know they make good torque and get better gas mileage but i'm just sayin power wise a turbocharged gas motor would make more power admittedly at a higher rpm for most engines unless you had a turboed 300 inline six but those have crappy flowing heads so power potential is pretty limited
 
  #4  
Old 02-01-2013, 10:09 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
i don't see how that makes diesel engines suck.everyone's entitled to their opinion.
 
  #5  
Old 02-01-2013, 10:19 PM
92blue on uhhhh blue's Avatar
92blue on uhhhh blue
92blue on uhhhh blue is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know its my opinion but without a turbo a diesels make no power just kinda thinking out loud that a turboed gas motor would make more power than a turbo diesel assuming all the variables the same (head flow turbo psi etc.)
 
  #6  
Old 02-01-2013, 10:21 PM
92blue on uhhhh blue's Avatar
92blue on uhhhh blue
92blue on uhhhh blue is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT
easy tiger.
you can force induct a gas job,but it's not going to be so easy on fuel as a diesel.
diesels are working engines.sure some guys now buy them just for fun (it surprises the hell out of me how many still,even in the new economy but its very good to see so many still so fortunate) but many of us are out there putting their low end grunt advantage to use getting decent fuel economy while hauling/towing loads that would make a gas engine scream and cost you at the pump.
i disagree with the right tune a gasser will get better gas mileage than stock. it does decrease power a little bit
 
  #7  
Old 02-02-2013, 12:16 AM
DIYiT's Avatar
DIYiT
DIYiT is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 92blue on uhhhh blue
i disagree with the right tune a gasser will get better gas mileage than stock. it does decrease power a little bit
Are you saying that a different tune will yield better fuel economy or that a forced induction motor will?

If you leave all else the same, yes, a tune can help with fuel economy. Both modern gasoline and diesel engines could be more fuel efficient if emissions weren't a concern. There are a lot of concessions made in the tune, and a lot of efficiency wasted in the after treatments (catalytic converter, particulate filters, DEF, etc) that rob power and decrease efficiency for the sake of cleanliness.

In the case of a forced induction gasoline motor, they will inherently get lower fuel economy than it's otherwise exact copy naturally aspirated motor. That is due to forced induction motors having a high BSFC (base specific fuel consumption). The way to alleviate this is to run a smaller engine with higher boost levels; ie the new Ecoboost motors.

As far as diesels "sucking" compared to gasoline motors, it's kind of an apples to oranges comparison. While both gasoline and diesel motors serve the same relative purpose in a truck (move a load), they both approach it from different, but equally valid, angles. Yes, gasoline motors, especially if designed with forced induction, will make more power, but it'll occur at a higher RPM range. This is great for small cars or the occasional sprint, but in long hard pulls up a mountain side (pulling a camper), a diesel is going to have the distinct advantage by not having to rev at high RPMs for an extended period of time. A gasoline motor will do it, but it'll make for higher wear and tear on the already lighter components of the gasoline engine. Diesels deal with the stress better due to their heavier parts, the lower RPM, and the lack of worry for pre-ignition and detonation as the combustion chamber warms up.

Personally, I'm sticking to my 460. Plenty of power but definitely not as much torque as a diesel can produce in low RPM ranges for extended towing. However, I also don't have the maintenance cost associated with the diesel engine.
 
  #8  
Old 02-02-2013, 12:20 AM
GNR22's Avatar
GNR22
GNR22 is offline
Fabri-cobbler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,163
Received 514 Likes on 339 Posts
Originally Posted by 92blue on uhhhh blue
i disagree with the right tune a gasser will get better gas mileage than stock. it does decrease power a little bit
You're really contradicting your argument here. With a diesel you get power AND fuel mileage. You don't have to pick a side.
 
  #9  
Old 02-02-2013, 12:24 AM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,845
Received 1,585 Likes on 1,292 Posts
Originally Posted by 92blue on uhhhh blue
anyone ever notice that diesels take a ton of boost from a turbo to make power not hating but i mean yeah ur diesel makes 800 ft pounds with at least 20 pounds of boost. put 20 pounds of boost on a gasser and it will make way more power. considering there are motors making way more power with less boost
You are moving into troll territory.

Your other post is a fine display of your genius and broad understanding of the internal combustion engine, on par with your understanding of the English language and it's uses.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ine-power.html

My guess is that you are 14.
 
  #10  
Old 02-02-2013, 12:26 AM
Evan_P's Avatar
Evan_P
Evan_P is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,490
Received 106 Likes on 86 Posts
Where did this thread come from? A turbo gas engine will probably make more HP than a turbo diesel, but no way in hell will it make more torque. With a truck application, HP really isn't on most people's minds. For a truck it more about torque and producing torque at lower RPM's. That's what most people look for at least. This brings me to your point of 20 PSI of boost in a gas engine and 20 PSI in a diesel. You may get more HP out of the gasser, but almost guaranteed you won't come close to that 800ft-lb of torque. And even if it did it wouldn't be making it till much higher in the RPM range. That 800ft-lb in the diesel, which I assume is pointing towards the 6.7 powerstroke, is there at 1600 RPM. In a gasser the turbo wouldn't even be close to spooling up. The other thing to think about is the other work required to run these boost levels. With most diesels, other than some tuning, and maybe injectors, you can run that turbo at 20 PSI all day long and still get decent fuel mileage. Withe that gasser, in most engines, you will be rebuilding the entire bottom end to handle that much boost at the RPM's that would produce power like the diesel. Not to mention, once the turbo is spooled up to that 20 PSI the engine will be at a much higher RPM requiring much more fuel to be used. So at the end of the day, diesel's do NOT suck. They have their well earned place. Saying that they need turbo's to make power is valid. HOWEVER, the trend of today's gas engines seems to be creating power with turbo's as well so you can't just dog of the diesels anymore.
 
  #11  
Old 02-02-2013, 02:32 AM
Festus Hagen's Avatar
Festus Hagen
Festus Hagen is offline
Methanoholic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maine (NorCal Native)
Posts: 6,442
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
O-boy, yur numbers are adding up quick ...

All things being equal, Diesel delivers more BTU per unit then Gasoline.

Thus delivers more power per unit then gasoline ...

Thus all things being equal will BLOW THE DOORS off a gasser!

EOS!

-Enjoy
fh : )_~
 
  #12  
Old 02-02-2013, 04:31 AM
86F150302's Avatar
86F150302
86F150302 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ive had a rough few days.. These 2 threads just brightened my day with laughter.
 
  #13  
Old 02-02-2013, 07:56 AM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
tjc transport is offline
i ain't rite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Posts: 60,946
Received 3,090 Likes on 2,154 Posts
Originally Posted by Evan_P
Where did this thread come from? A turbo gas engine will probably make more HP than a turbo diesel, but no way in hell will it make more torque. With a truck application, HP really isn't on most people's minds. For a truck it more about torque and producing torque at lower RPM's. That's what most people look for at least. This brings me to your point of 20 PSI of boost in a gas engine and 20 PSI in a diesel. You may get more HP out of the gasser, but almost guaranteed you won't come close to that 800ft-lb of torque. And even if it did it wouldn't be making it till much higher in the RPM range. That 800ft-lb in the diesel, which I assume is pointing towards the 6.7 powerstroke, is there at 1600 RPM. In a gasser the turbo wouldn't even be close to spooling up. The other thing to think about is the other work required to run these boost levels. With most diesels, other than some tuning, and maybe injectors, you can run that turbo at 20 PSI all day long and still get decent fuel mileage. Withe that gasser, in most engines, you will be rebuilding the entire bottom end to handle that much boost at the RPM's that would produce power like the diesel. Not to mention, once the turbo is spooled up to that 20 PSI the engine will be at a much higher RPM requiring much more fuel to be used. So at the end of the day, diesel's do NOT suck. They have their well earned place. Saying that they need turbo's to make power is valid. HOWEVER, the trend of today's gas engines seems to be creating power with turbo's as well so you can't just dog of the diesels anymore.


20 lbs of boost on a 4 cylinder will give you 400 hp and 200 lbs torque at 9,000 rpm.
a naturally aspirated 7.3 only makes 185 hp at 3000 rpm, but it also makes 360 lbs torque at 1400 rpm. so while it is not a race car, it will do anything you ask it to do. just not fast.
 
  #14  
Old 02-02-2013, 08:27 AM
92blue on uhhhh blue's Avatar
92blue on uhhhh blue
92blue on uhhhh blue is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
You are moving into troll territory.

Your other post is a fine display of your genius and broad understanding of the internal combustion engine, on par with your understanding of the English language and it's uses.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ine-power.html

My guess is that you are 14.
that tread was just a jumbled mess. all i wanted to know is if someone threw a stock 4.9 on the dyno and see what they made and apparently i started something
 
  #15  
Old 02-02-2013, 08:34 AM
jroehl's Avatar
jroehl
jroehl is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lafayette, IN
Posts: 6,473
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
How many gas semi-tractors do you see? Why?

You can talk all you want about turbos and fuel economy, but the reality comes down to the difference in how the two fuels burn. Flame-front propagation is much quicker in gasoline, making it better suited for higher-RPM applications. Diesel burns much more slowly, requires higher temperatures and pressures to ignite (but it actually burns cooler than gasoline in open air), which means it can be run at much higher compression ratios--roughly double that of a gas engine. Note that gas engines are typically in the 9-10:1 ratio if naturally aspirated (20:1 for an NA diesel) and 6-8:1 for an induction setup on a gas engine (16:1 for an induction diesel). For those much higher compression ratios, stronger, heavier engine components are needed, which are less of a factor on a much heavier truck. So, to make the same power and torque, a gas engine has to be spun up--which is more wear and tear on those lighter components.

Jason

P.S. Low-RPM torque is what gets loads moving from a stop, which is how diesels excel. Also, the higher compression ratio gives much better engine braking, which is almost a necessity with heavy loads if you want your brakes to last any significant amount of time.
 


Quick Reply: why diesels suck



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.