Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 High Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-17-2012, 03:40 PM
wag53's Avatar
wag53
wag53 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sumter SC
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5.0 High Performance

OK, recently bought a 1993 F150 ext cab XLT with Mark III option and 5.0 High Performance engine. Does anybody know anything aout this option? The PO said it was rated at 210 HP. Can't seem to see anything different about the engine, looks just the same as my old 5.0 in a 1990.
 
  #2  
Old 09-17-2012, 05:02 PM
GNR22's Avatar
GNR22
GNR22 is offline
Fabri-cobbler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,163
Received 515 Likes on 340 Posts
As far as I know, the Mark III option didn't have any kind of engine modification, it was all show. A 5.0 HO does exist though. They put them in Mustangs. They're good motors in a car, or a lighter truck. I'm pretty sure the HO 5.0 motors said 302 HO on top of the motor, so it would be visual unless it's changed. I believe that the HO motors were like 220 horse and 300 ft/lbs of torque, something like that. But I'm pretty sure those 5.0 motors in trucks were rated for right around 200 horse, maybe a little more in that time period.
If I'm wrong, someone will correct me.
 
  #3  
Old 09-17-2012, 10:40 PM
impish's Avatar
impish
impish is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GNR22
As far as I know, the Mark III option didn't have any kind of engine modification, it was all show. A 5.0 HO does exist though. They put them in Mustangs. They're good motors in a car, or a lighter truck. I'm pretty sure the HO 5.0 motors said 302 HO on top of the motor, so it would be visual unless it's changed. I believe that the HO motors were like 220 horse and 300 ft/lbs of torque, something like that. But I'm pretty sure those 5.0 motors in trucks were rated for right around 200 horse, maybe a little more in that time period.
If I'm wrong, someone will correct me.
5.0L H-O eng. began useage in late 1980s w/ fuel injection, my 1989 had roller camshaft, but not roller rocker arms. This continued up till 1995. However, in 1993, Cobra was re-introduced, WITH roller camshaft AND roller rocker arms, as well as larger capacity fuel injectors.

Regular 5.0 H-O engines in Mustang had 19 lb/hr injectors, Cobra had 24 lb/hr, requiring DIFFERENT calibration of computer. 5.0 HO was rated nominally 225 HP, Cobra 245 HP. impish
 
  #4  
Old 09-17-2012, 10:49 PM
Nathanl25's Avatar
Nathanl25
Nathanl25 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only difference that i knew of between the regular 5.0 and the H.O.'s, was that the H.O. had a different taller cam lobe and firing order. Allowing it to breath better and run smoother, while making more horsepower.
 
  #5  
Old 09-17-2012, 11:28 PM
impish's Avatar
impish
impish is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nathanl25
The only difference that i knew of between the regular 5.0 and the H.O.'s, was that the H.O. had a different taller cam lobe and firing order. Allowing it to breath better and run smoother, while making more horsepower.
5.0s in trucks did not come with roller cams. The firing order was also different, actually, the old, familiar Ford V-8 firing order from years back.

5.0 H-Os as used in Mustang (and maybe Lincoln), had a REVISED firing order, which Ford claimed RELIEVED some load on the FRONT MAIN BEARINGS. Thus, messing with interchanging camshafts causes plenty of confusion, due to the firing order difference, not to mentioon the fact that H-Os had STEEL gears on the distributor shafts, which would EAT the cast iron gear of the flat-tappet camshaftr, if used with an H-O distributor gear.

(watch the locations of those plug wires, guys!).

impish
 
  #6  
Old 09-18-2012, 07:17 AM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by wag53
OK, recently bought a 1993 F150 ext cab XLT with Mark III option and 5.0 High Performance engine. Does anybody know anything aout this option? The PO said it was rated at 210 HP. Can't seem to see anything different about the engine, looks just the same as my old 5.0 in a 1990.
You were LIED to. The MarkIII conversion was cosmetic ONLY.

BUT an easy way to tell if you have a5.0 HO in your truck would to look at the plentum. If it goes over the passenger side valve cover it is NOT. If it goes over the drivers side vale cover it IS
 
  #7  
Old 09-18-2012, 09:09 AM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by impish
5.0s in trucks did not come with roller cams. The firing order was also different, actually, the old, familiar Ford V-8 firing order from years back.

5.0 H-Os as used in Mustang (and maybe Lincoln), had a REVISED firing order, which Ford claimed RELIEVED some load on the FRONT MAIN BEARINGS. Thus, messing with interchanging camshafts causes plenty of confusion, due to the firing order difference, not to mentioon the fact that H-Os had STEEL gears on the distributor shafts, which would EAT the cast iron gear of the flat-tappet camshaftr, if used with an H-O distributor gear.

(watch the locations of those plug wires, guys!).

impish
....The 94 + truck 302s had roller cams , and some had mass air and sefi , the cams were just samaller than the HO cam , they have the same firing order as the HO and used the steel cam gear for the steel roller cam....
 
  #8  
Old 09-18-2012, 09:24 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,914
Likes: 0
Received 959 Likes on 759 Posts
Actually some trucks were equipped with roller cams as early as '92 but it was the tiny Crown Vic cam with the old firing order, these trucks were the dumping ground for all kinds of leftover bits unfortunately.
As for the PO's question about his MK3, you would know if you had a HO.. the truck would really haul with the hammer down.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mustangtoby2001
5.0L Coyote
18
06-12-2010 01:00 AM
Richiemech
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
12-24-2006 07:46 PM
mrwillie66
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
03-10-2005 04:40 AM
scalezy3b811
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
02-02-2005 07:27 AM
jams3
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
12-04-2000 11:53 AM



Quick Reply: 5.0 High Performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM.