Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

How about an aluminum F150?

  #16  
Old 07-27-2012, 05:21 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,120
Received 1,217 Likes on 800 Posts
Originally Posted by FORD COASTIE
Glad to see I'm not the only Permanent Cutterman on these boards. Lol.
No, your in good company bro. I can see these trucks being built with a zinc fitting in a few years. LOL.
 
  #17  
Old 07-27-2012, 07:59 AM
shortride's Avatar
shortride
shortride is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: 46th State
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
These are the Ford vehicles using aluminum panels. I don't think I've heard any complaints so far.

Expedition (hood & liftgate)
Explorer (hood and fenders)
F-150 (hood)
Lincoln Navigator (hood & liftgate)
Lincoln LS (hood, fender & trunk lid)
Ranger (hood)
Lincoln Town Car (hood)
GT (body panels)
Mustang GT (hood)
 
  #18  
Old 07-27-2012, 11:12 AM
Pool Runner's Avatar
Pool Runner
Pool Runner is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
So Ford is planning to bring this truck to market in 2014, why would they spend as much money as they have to update & change the 2013 only to change the entire truck in less than a year?

Since I use my truck as a truck daily not sure how I feel about aluminum, it's not like you can just have a dent service repair it when you get a door ding or worse. I know if we all want to keep driving full sized trucks we are going to have to put up with some comprimise to get better fuel mileage out of these things.
 
  #19  
Old 07-27-2012, 11:19 AM
FlatBlak's Avatar
FlatBlak
FlatBlak is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i love the idea, ill take aluminum over steel any day. we have the technology now, aluminum panels can be manipulated just as well as steel, if it cracks its a cleaner fix than steel. steel you always have to worry about rust. if you fix that rust, chances are its going to come back, its a never ending battle. its lighter, may not be as strong but the body on a truck isnt really for structure anyways. thats what the frame is for. i really wish they did this when fords actually had nice trucks (no offense to you guys that own the new trucks) i wouldnt be searching the country side for a rust free 67, or at least one thats driveable until i have the funds to fully restore one.
 
  #20  
Old 07-27-2012, 12:01 PM
Tylus's Avatar
Tylus
Tylus is offline
MMNC (SS)(Ret)

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SE Georgia
Posts: 11,308
Received 30 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by shortride
These are the Ford vehicles using aluminum panels. I don't think I've heard any complaints so far.

Expedition (hood & liftgate)
Explorer (hood and fenders)
F-150 (hood)
Lincoln Navigator (hood & liftgate)
Lincoln LS (hood, fender & trunk lid)
Ranger (hood)
Lincoln Town Car (hood)
GT (body panels)
Mustang GT (hood)
There are alot of people out there with 06-09 Fords that've experienced the corroding hood and rear hatch. I saw it on my 08 Expy and 09 Mustang. Ford has issued several TSB's for it as well

I'm all for the process if the can stop the corrosion issue cold
 
  #21  
Old 07-27-2012, 02:03 PM
Archion's Avatar
Archion
Archion is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Tylus
God I hope not. Ford has enough issues getting their current aluminum panels to stay painted as it is.

FYI, Ford has been running aluminum hoods and rear hatches since around 2004. It's been 8 yrs and they still corrode pretty regularly within the 1st year



the weight savings would be nice though

Why paint it?, think Cobra...
 
  #22  
Old 07-27-2012, 03:03 PM
ItsAFord55's Avatar
ItsAFord55
ItsAFord55 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like my old steel pickup, i like the feeling of having heavy protection rather then feeling like a soda can on wheels.
 
  #23  
Old 07-27-2012, 03:05 PM
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
YoGeorge is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,509
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Question #1: what does it cost? #2 how does it do with hail dents (had a recent experience with these but my E150 got NONE in the same storm)
 
  #24  
Old 07-27-2012, 03:56 PM
shortride's Avatar
shortride
shortride is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: 46th State
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
It will be interesting to see what the fuel mileage is going to be on a truck that's going to be approximately 700 lbs. lighter. Tooling cost should be lower because aluminum forming isn't as hard on tooling as steel but I promise any savings will not be passed on to the customer. Which ever model year it happens in, Ford could be re-designing the truck. The existing tooling dies can't be used on aluminum.
 
  #25  
Old 07-27-2012, 04:27 PM
MCDavis's Avatar
MCDavis
MCDavis is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RVA
Posts: 10,459
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
In theory...this is good. Fuel efficiency should increase and payload should increase too. We will have to wait and see. Im ok with the aluminum panels. Harder to repair though (think dent removal) and that could be problematic.

Due to the increase in safety needs these trucks have become pigs. Im all for something to reduce the weight and gain some relief on a weekly basis at the pump.
 
  #26  
Old 07-27-2012, 09:38 PM
BrockwayMT's Avatar
BrockwayMT
BrockwayMT is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Freightliners have been aluminum for a long time.

Cost will be a big question. Galvanic corrosion will always be an issue as well. How that works out with the liquid salt up here will be interesting to see. Weight savings is a great thing but pickups already cost way too much IMO.
 
  #27  
Old 07-28-2012, 08:18 AM
DIXIEDOG1's Avatar
DIXIEDOG1
DIXIEDOG1 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aluminum may not rust but as mentioned it corrodes and it's the same end result.


Aluminum tooling is cheaper but the material cost is higher so any price saving will be eaten up and they don't tool for every unit like purchasing more expensive material.


I'd just as soon stick with steel.....Land Rover Discovery has been using aluminum for a very long time but haven't really taken the market over yet. I don't see it happening with Ford either.
 
  #28  
Old 07-28-2012, 05:47 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4
efx4 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,058
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As long as there is a form of material between the dissimilar metals, there should be no galvanic reaction between them. Aluminum is softer than steel, and may need a reinforcing material bonded behind to make the panel less flimsy (many steel panels on vehicles have this). Repairability requires more knowledge to work with, especially welding, but the weight savings should pay off in better mpg, acceleration, braking and handling. I'm sure there will be some good and bad, but aluminum is used in many vehicles with little issue.
 
  #29  
Old 07-28-2012, 08:15 PM
19fifty4's Avatar
19fifty4
19fifty4 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
If there is a 25% savings in the price and a 25% increase in the MPG's and can still perform/function like the current steel ones do, then count me in. I'm afraid it's going to cost more, have very little gains in fuel economy and be about as bulletproof as a beer can. I am skeptical.
 
  #30  
Old 07-28-2012, 09:04 PM
Greg B's Avatar
Greg B
Greg B is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Aluminum may knock some weight off, but the raw material is more expensive than steel. I don't think the mileage increase would offset the cost. Ford and the rest of the manufacturers have already priced themselves out of the market for the average working person. If the automakers are willing to permanently settle for sales of 8-9M vehicles annually it could happen. But aluminum is more susceptible to stress cracks than steel. Anyone who is familiar with the aviation industry and airplane maintenance knows this first hand. I certainly wouldn't want to have to deal with stress cracks in a roof panel, cowl panel, or someplace that would cause water to leak into the vehicle. And at $40K and up MSRP you can't consider F150's throw-away vehicles.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: How about an aluminum F150?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.