Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

289 V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-24-2012, 09:00 PM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray
Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
289 V8

So i just recently found out that sitting in our shed is a 289 V8 from a Fairlane. Dad says these are really hard to come by, but were good motors.
Ive been curious to see how you guys think this would do in a ford pickup, and, if worth it, how hard would it be to swap it into my 90 f250
 
  #2  
Old 01-24-2012, 09:08 PM
blkF250HD's Avatar
blkF250HD
blkF250HD is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was a fairly common engine, especially in Mustangs. It's part of the Windsor family, but I'm not sure if the bellhousings were all the same (doubt it). IMO something like that would be better in a period correct (mid 60's) truck, or a car from that time. Not sure if you'd be satisfied with the power output in a heavy truck.
 
  #3  
Old 01-24-2012, 09:09 PM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I imagine it would be like a 302. Great in a small car, or truck. But suck in a full size pickup.
 
  #4  
Old 01-24-2012, 09:37 PM
critterf1's Avatar
critterf1
critterf1 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Newport, N.C.
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Bell-housings are the same except for the early 289 with only 5 bolts.
 
  #5  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:45 AM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray
Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well the problem is my current 5.8 runs like crap, and id prefer to have a lower power (which is still probably more than i got now) but more reliable engine. also perhaps get some better milage
 
  #6  
Old 01-25-2012, 09:50 AM
andym's Avatar
andym
andym is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 19,402
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
Why would you want less power? That makes no sense. It won't be any more reliable, and I really doubt it will get any better mileage, unless you count the times you'll have to get out and push it up the hill.
 
  #7  
Old 01-25-2012, 10:09 AM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray
Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no, u mis read, id prefer to have a lower power motor compared to one that runs crappy
 
  #8  
Old 01-25-2012, 10:20 AM
andym's Avatar
andym
andym is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 19,402
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
I did misread that. But, ideally, wouldn't you like to have a powerful motor that runs smooth? Why not fix the 351w and have that?
 
  #9  
Old 01-25-2012, 10:46 AM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I second rebuilding, or fixing the 351w.

Keep the 289. Stick it in a old mustang, small ranger, bronco2, ect.
 
  #10  
Old 01-25-2012, 10:54 AM
White 97 xlt's Avatar
White 97 xlt
White 97 xlt is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cleveland, TN
Posts: 4,728
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Just repair the 351, when and if you get the 289 COBBLED into the truck, you will have a lower horsepower engine that still runs like crap .. Even if you got it to run well your fuel mileage will be terrible since the smaller engine will be working it's self to death trying to keep up.. And, if you have an OD transmission just FORGET about overdrive, the 289 won't have enough torque at a low RPM to make it useful..

I'm not trying to pee on your parade, just pointing out reality..
 
  #11  
Old 01-25-2012, 02:28 PM
tbirdscott's Avatar
tbirdscott
tbirdscott is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Willow River B.C.
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
289 is a destroked 302. The crank and rods are the difference between the two. Use the same pistons, heads, and intakes.

I would never give up a 351W for a 289/302.

Didn't it occur to you that fixing your 351 would be easier than rebuilding and swapping in a different engine?

Scott
 
  #12  
Old 01-25-2012, 06:22 PM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray
Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know your all right about fixing my current engine..... its just frustrating as all hell just cause i dont know whats wrong, and neither does anyone else, and i dont have the money to fix it even if i did know what was wrong
 
  #13  
Old 01-25-2012, 06:31 PM
86F150302's Avatar
86F150302
86F150302 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Have you tried pulling the codes???
 
  #14  
Old 01-25-2012, 06:39 PM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray
Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If i say yes will you believe me?, no i havent as im not getting a check engine light, and yes the light works.
 
  #15  
Old 01-25-2012, 07:25 PM
White 97 xlt's Avatar
White 97 xlt
White 97 xlt is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cleveland, TN
Posts: 4,728
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
There could be stored codes in the continuous memory without a light being on...

If you don't have the money to fix this engine, where do you plan to get the money to do a swap???
 


Quick Reply: 289 V8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.