Notices

Aftermarket fuel tank questions/advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-03-2011, 07:55 PM
trvlrerik's Avatar
trvlrerik
trvlrerik is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Salina, Ks.
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aftermarket fuel tank questions/advice

I have an 08 F350 short wheel base, with 6.4 Powerstroke and I want to add more fuel capacity so I can pick when I want to fuel up, rather than worry about if I am in range of a fuel station.

I have decided that I am going to get a 50 to 60 gallon transfer/aux toolbox in bed tank that I can re-use from truck to truck.

There are many options that effect the cost and weight of the tank. Are internal baffles a must have option? It seems to me that there is a variance of weight in the tanks of nearly 100 lbs, the lighter tanks are more expensive, but have no baffles in them. Is adding 400+ lbs of fuel and 100+ lbs of tank to an F350 even that big of a deal anyway?

My fifth wheel adds about 3000lbs to the bed, and I have Firestone ride rite bags installed. Thanks for any advice.
 
  #2  
Old 07-03-2011, 09:08 PM
lakedweller's Avatar
lakedweller
lakedweller is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryville (Mur Vul), TN
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I plan on doing mine as soon as I can get my wife off the $800 for the tank/tool box...
 
  #3  
Old 07-03-2011, 10:35 PM
dyoungen's Avatar
dyoungen
dyoungen is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perry Georgia
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bought a 91 gallon tank that fit my 1987 F250 from either Harbor Freight or Northern tool. From what I hear if you have a tank over 100 or 110 gallons you have to get all kinds of labels saying what your carrying.
 
  #4  
Old 07-12-2011, 01:27 PM
n4aof's Avatar
n4aof
n4aof is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by trvlrerik
Are internal baffles a must have option
Internal baffles are not important IF (and only if) you only operate with the tank either full or empty.

The weight itself won't be an issue with a properly mounted tank at the front of the bed of an F350 -- the problem comes when the fuel sloshes from side to side during a turn, especially an S-curve or similar maneuver.

When the tank is either full or empty, there is no problem with the weight shifting, but if you go into a turn with half a tank of fuel, the weight will shift to the outside -- the quicker the turn, the faster the weight shift and the more drastic the effects.

The absolute worst case would be a half-tank, and you suddenly need to swerve around the non-driving-fool who just pulled out in front of you or who just had something drop off his vehicle.

The weight is well above the truck center of gravity, so having it shift suddenly can make maneuvers very interesting.
 
  #5  
Old 08-19-2012, 11:39 AM
srteach's Avatar
srteach
srteach is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The weight is well above the truck center of gravity, so having it shift suddenly can make maneuvers very interesting.
He is dead correct. VERY INTERESTING.

Diesel fuel has a weight of 6.951 pounds/gallon on the low end. You are talking at least 347.55 pounds (50 gal tank) transferring to the outer radius of the turn all at the same time. That, multiplied by the distance above CoG, along with tongue weight of the trailer makes one hell of a mass shift. The less the mass shifts, the less effect there is on control. Having the weight that far above the Center of Gravity (CoG) can actually cause the truck to roll over in emergency situations.

This all depends on tire inflation, other weights and their placement, suspension components and their condition and a myriad other factors. Best and safest is to have baffles in the tank to prevent slosh.
 
  #6  
Old 08-26-2012, 03:19 AM
RPM371's Avatar
RPM371
RPM371 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm looking at one of these:

The lid conceals the filler cap and and adds an extra bit of security at $4 a gallon.

(and it has baffles)
 
  #7  
Old 08-26-2012, 10:24 AM
srteach's Avatar
srteach
srteach is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That looks like a good tank, RPM.

BTW, I designed a tank for my dad. It was 77.5gal, the width and depth of the bed and had 5 baffles (1 side to side, 4 front to back). He reports no issues with slosh weight from it.
I had to design it to fit under a side load ATV rack / bed cap he had designed. He needed access to the tank with 2 ATVs on the bed and the cap closed. Made an interesting design challenge.
 
  #8  
Old 08-26-2012, 10:54 AM
RPM371's Avatar
RPM371
RPM371 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I like that design better than the 2 piece "Lego" setup I see with most tanks and toolboxes. Not only does it advertise you have fuel to steal, it makes it easier to get to.

The only drawback to the combo design is a smaller toolbox.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austint513
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
40
01-17-2014 07:32 PM
ridealong34
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
01-11-2014 04:51 PM
Doonz
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
6
09-06-2013 09:09 AM
vettman
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
05-30-2012 07:50 PM
mlevario99
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
4
09-06-2011 07:46 AM



Quick Reply: Aftermarket fuel tank questions/advice



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.