EcoBoost (all engine sizes) 3.5L Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6, 2.7 Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6, 2.3l/2.0L I4 EcoBoost Engines

Ecoboost torture test videos?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-23-2011, 08:25 AM
drh1175's Avatar
drh1175
drh1175 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ecoboost torture test videos?

I thought the videos were Great to showcase the new engine. But even as a lifelong for fanatic I am a little skeptical at the head to head video. I just can't believe the Eco boost is that much faster than the dodge hemi and chev 5.3. It is like the other 2 gives the ecoboost a head start and lets them win. no way would the ford be that much faster. I like the new engine and have one ordered but i still have my doubts it is that powerful. What do you all think?
 
  #2  
Old 03-23-2011, 09:59 AM
Smokey1's Avatar
Smokey1
Smokey1 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm going to assume you haven't seen the torque curve?

Or should I call it the torque line
 
  #3  
Old 03-23-2011, 10:08 AM
Arctic Fox's Avatar
Arctic Fox
Arctic Fox is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smokey1
I'm going to assume you haven't seen the torque curve?

Or should I call it the torque line
Ford did produce the torque curve graph...it may be a slight biased, possibly, maybe....

It'd be nice to see a third party doing the tests and showing the same type of graph. Only then could I believe without a doubt.
 
  #4  
Old 03-23-2011, 10:12 AM
Smokey1's Avatar
Smokey1
Smokey1 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you really think they are willing to bet their reputation and produce false dyno graphs that can be easily redone by third party testing? I'm betting no.
 
  #5  
Old 03-23-2011, 11:27 AM
drh1175's Avatar
drh1175
drh1175 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't. Doubt the torque just is it that much more than the other two? I guess I will find out when mine comes in
 
  #6  
Old 03-23-2011, 12:12 PM
Arctic Fox's Avatar
Arctic Fox
Arctic Fox is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smokey1
Do you really think they are willing to bet their reputation and produce false dyno graphs that can be easily redone by third party testing? I'm betting no.
The graphs we have all seen from Ford are numbers produced at the crank of the engine. Put the trucks on dynos and the numbers will be very different at the wheels. This is where Ford could always dispute their testing.

The best way to know is with real world driving. I am very skeptical of the torque graphs from Ford. The reason being, I have test driven both EB and 6.2L. I have clearly found the 6.2L to have more "pull" throughout the RPM bandwidth. The graphs from Ford don't show it like this at all. What the graphs show and what I "felt" with driving both engines were two different things. This is my opinion of course. Everyone will feel the torque differently I guess.
 
  #7  
Old 03-23-2011, 01:49 PM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Does it really matter if your truck is a half second quicker than the other?

I like the log pull, daytona, and torture test, but the drag racing is for kids...
 
  #8  
Old 03-23-2011, 02:27 PM
drh1175's Avatar
drh1175
drh1175 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The log pull daytona and the torture were great and really sold me. I just thought the drag was silly.
 
  #9  
Old 03-23-2011, 02:46 PM
Joe Finn's Avatar
Joe Finn
Joe Finn is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the point of the drag was to try and sway some of the die-hard V8 crowd with a direct comparison.
 
  #10  
Old 03-23-2011, 02:58 PM
Smokey1's Avatar
Smokey1
Smokey1 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Arctic Fox
The graphs we have all seen from Ford are numbers produced at the crank of the engine. Put the trucks on dynos and the numbers will be very different at the wheels. This is where Ford could always dispute their testing.

The best way to know is with real world driving. I am very skeptical of the torque graphs from Ford. The reason being, I have test driven both EB and 6.2L. I have clearly found the 6.2L to have more "pull" throughout the RPM bandwidth. The graphs from Ford don't show it like this at all. What the graphs show and what I "felt" with driving both engines were two different things. This is my opinion of course. Everyone will feel the torque differently I guess.
No. A torque curve will look the same at the wheels, obviously at a lower number, but it should be an almost identical line as the crank dyno.
 
  #11  
Old 03-23-2011, 03:48 PM
Bryanox's Avatar
Bryanox
Bryanox is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will probably purchase a EB in my next truck. I believe it will suit my needs better than the other options. The torture test isn't what sold me on the EB. I am still skeptical of "simulated mileage". I would have liked to known the actual mileage on the truck. I would have also liked to see maintenance records to see if there were any problems with the engine they had to correct during testing.
 
  #12  
Old 03-23-2011, 07:29 PM
juneau76's Avatar
juneau76
juneau76 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Those videos were all pretty cool, but I could give a rat's rear end about a drag race to see whose truck is faster off the line, in the 1/4 mile, etc. I may be getting old. Oh, and it was Homestead-Miami Speedway, not Daytona.
 
  #13  
Old 03-23-2011, 07:54 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
LxMan1 is offline
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,436
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Moved to correct forum.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
huntnrig
2009 - 2014 F150
185
09-27-2023 12:47 PM
makuloco2000
2009 - 2014 F150
30
06-07-2017 08:57 AM
JayShade
EcoBoost (all engine sizes)
3
05-11-2017 07:04 PM
WXboy
2009 - 2014 F150
58
01-05-2016 09:46 AM
makuloco2000
2009 - 2014 F150
25
02-01-2015 11:24 AM



Quick Reply: Ecoboost torture test videos?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.